Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
If financially I had to get to one watch I could.
That said (and I'm actually selling to achieve this in my collection....) I can get to 3 or 4 and hold that number. The watches that compose that finite number may change but I can achieve that number.
For me:
1 or 2 divers
1 chrono
1 versatile dress up/or down all purpose watch that is a strap magnet
That said (and I'm actually selling to achieve this in my collection....) I can get to 3 or 4 and hold that number. The watches that compose that finite number may change but I can achieve that number.
For me:
1 or 2 divers
1 chrono
1 versatile dress up/or down all purpose watch that is a strap magnet
Small collection of timepieces that I enjoy
- jkbarnes
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 7852
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 8:39 pm
- CW-watches: 3
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
Perhaps giving some thought to the “one watch” question is a bit like checking ones bearings while one journey. You might not ever settle on one watch but thinking it about it keeps you on the right path.
Drew
- Amor Vincit Omnia
- Moderator
- Posts: 33793
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:34 pm
- CW-watches: 4
- Location: Norfolk, UK
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
Good to see you back, Greg.gwells wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:59 ammaybe it was the one before the cartier? i'm sure steve will chime in and correct me. i could have sworn he had an expensive regret watch.Bahnstormer_vRS wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:22 am ^^^^You're correct about Scooter. It was a while back that he went on a 'long journey' to get a Jager LeCoutre (or similar) but ended up selling it for his Rolex Submariner.
As for AVO and his Cartier Tank? Sorry, but you're totally barking up the wrong tree on that. He's still got it, and will likely never let it go.
Guy
Sent from my Xperia 5 using Tapatalk
Guy is correct; the Tank is still here and going nowhere. It was probably the Nomos Tangente that I had for a few years. Although it was the most expensive watch I had bought at the time, it wasn't really a regret. I sold it because after the Tank arrived I wasn't wearing it.
I do regret selling it because it was a lovely watch. There are sometimes days when I wish I still had it. But I have drifted away a little from the pure dress and vintage styles, so even were I to replace it, it still probably wouldn't get worn that much.
Steve
Linguist; retired teacher; pilgrim; apprentice travel writer
Take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but footprints, kill nothing but time
Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit. (Max Ehrmann)
Linguist; retired teacher; pilgrim; apprentice travel writer
Take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but footprints, kill nothing but time
Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit. (Max Ehrmann)
- Wis
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 3632
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:07 pm
- CW-watches: 1
- Location: Near Oslo, Norway
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
The concept of a one-watch is interesting. One watch that will not look out of place anywhere, and do basically everything. It is not the ‘my watch’ of most people way back when, which is of course what we would now call a dress watch.
So it is a ‘middle of the road’ kind of watch. A goldilock watch. Not too this and not too that. Of course, this is highly subjective. What looks out of place to me may seem perfectly ok to you. The Submariner is an interesting case to consider. It began life as a tool, designed to do a job.
Now the Submariner seems to qualify as a one-watch for most people - perhaps even the ultimate one-watch for men, because of years of very clever marketing. I would have liked to be present when someone bravely proposed that what was a very toolish watch ought to be marketed as a watch equally at home in the boardroom and at a cocktail reception as below the sea. Maybe the idea came from the Bond film? It is well documented that Connery was handed the personal Rolex of someone on the film set for the famous scene. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable in Rolex lore can tell us when the first ad along these lines came? And because of the Submariner other divers watches seem to qualify also, as long as they are somewhat discreet.
It seems to me that the current craze for steel sports watches is in part because they are seen as a one-watch to many people. A watch that is sporty, but ‘equally at home in the boardroom’.
So it is a ‘middle of the road’ kind of watch. A goldilock watch. Not too this and not too that. Of course, this is highly subjective. What looks out of place to me may seem perfectly ok to you. The Submariner is an interesting case to consider. It began life as a tool, designed to do a job.
Now the Submariner seems to qualify as a one-watch for most people - perhaps even the ultimate one-watch for men, because of years of very clever marketing. I would have liked to be present when someone bravely proposed that what was a very toolish watch ought to be marketed as a watch equally at home in the boardroom and at a cocktail reception as below the sea. Maybe the idea came from the Bond film? It is well documented that Connery was handed the personal Rolex of someone on the film set for the famous scene. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable in Rolex lore can tell us when the first ad along these lines came? And because of the Submariner other divers watches seem to qualify also, as long as they are somewhat discreet.
It seems to me that the current craze for steel sports watches is in part because they are seen as a one-watch to many people. A watch that is sporty, but ‘equally at home in the boardroom’.
Bjørn
- TheBeatles
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:36 am
- CW-watches: 6
- Location: England
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
ONE watch!!!
Are you mad, girl. Or have you been talking to my wife?
Are you mad, girl. Or have you been talking to my wife?
Basically, I'm for anything that gets you through the night. Be it prayer, tranquilizers or a bottle of Jack Daniels, Frank Sinatra
All You Need Is Love, The Beatles
Too much of anything is bad. But too much of good whiskey is barely enough, Mark Twain
All You Need Is Love, The Beatles
Too much of anything is bad. But too much of good whiskey is barely enough, Mark Twain
- Amor Vincit Omnia
- Moderator
- Posts: 33793
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:34 pm
- CW-watches: 4
- Location: Norfolk, UK
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
I think these two sentences are quite telling, Bjørn. Whatever its beginnings, I do believe that the Submariner has been for a long time now a sensible, almost conservative, choice for a one watch. A dive watch that is discreet, perhaps some kind of PO or perhaps even a Trident mark 3, is quite obviously acceptable in any situation. The Rolex has a lot of plus points: great brand history and image; smart and stylish; excellent construction and reliability; and to quote an old advert for some type of booze (I can’t remember which) – reassuringly expensive.Wis wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:59 pm And because of the Submariner other divers watches seem to qualify also, as long as they are somewhat discreet.
It seems to me that the current craze for steel sports watches is in part because they are seen as a one-watch to many people. A watch that is sporty, but ‘equally at home in the boardroom’.
Steve
Linguist; retired teacher; pilgrim; apprentice travel writer
Take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but footprints, kill nothing but time
Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit. (Max Ehrmann)
Linguist; retired teacher; pilgrim; apprentice travel writer
Take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but footprints, kill nothing but time
Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit. (Max Ehrmann)
- missF
- CW Forum Poet Laureate
- Posts: 11866
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:59 pm
- CW-watches: 3
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
TheBeatles wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:03 pm ONE watch!!!
Are you mad, girl. Or have you been talking to my wife?
watching you fail in your quest for a “one watch” has been great entertainment
Watchaholic
‘Imprudently spendy’
Thomcat00
Watchaholic
‘Imprudently spendy’
Thomcat00
- gwells
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 7642
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:02 am
- CW-watches: 1
- Location: falls church, va
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
We live in a different age than the mad men era, where there were “proper” watches to wear for certain situations.
Personally, I’d wear a lot of my regular watches with a tux. I mean, if I didn’t have my grandfather’s omega deville, which a tux is a good excuse to wear it. But the PO, the blue 556i (my tux jacket has a subtle blue plaid), the aqua terra, my old zodiac seawolf... few people worry about it that much any more, so I would avoid something that just looked awkward; U1, Doxa, a gshock, or something brightly colored/oversized.
Like I said, the world has changed. Most of us don’t wear suits or ties to work any more. I wear jeans and a collared shirt 99% of the time (even pre-pandemic) and I work in a large, professional AE firm. Watches have evolved the same way.
Personally, I’d wear a lot of my regular watches with a tux. I mean, if I didn’t have my grandfather’s omega deville, which a tux is a good excuse to wear it. But the PO, the blue 556i (my tux jacket has a subtle blue plaid), the aqua terra, my old zodiac seawolf... few people worry about it that much any more, so I would avoid something that just looked awkward; U1, Doxa, a gshock, or something brightly colored/oversized.
Like I said, the world has changed. Most of us don’t wear suits or ties to work any more. I wear jeans and a collared shirt 99% of the time (even pre-pandemic) and I work in a large, professional AE firm. Watches have evolved the same way.
the "g" is for Greg...
- stefs
- Trusted Seller
- Posts: 5952
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:40 pm
- CW-watches: 2
- Location: Sunny Tiptree, Essex
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
That is where I got to for quite a long whileViognier wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:39 am If financially I had to get to one watch I could.
That said (and I'm actually selling to achieve this in my collection....) I can get to 3 or 4 and hold that number. The watches that compose that finite number may change but I can achieve that number.
For me:
1 or 2 divers
1 chrono
1 versatile dress up/or down all purpose watch that is a strap magnet
1 gmt
1 diver
1 dj
1 dressy (reverso)
This i still reckon is a good 4 watch collection but was supposed to be the stage before reducing further. Instead with my recent cw splurg plus a seiko I have gone further away still and it isn’t something I’m over comfortable with.
I wonder if just one watch is actually easier to deal with than a small collection
Cheers now, Paul
- missF
- CW Forum Poet Laureate
- Posts: 11866
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:59 pm
- CW-watches: 3
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
Sounds like a touch of rotation drama. I find it interesting that many of us have a limit beyond which we get uncomfortable with our collection.
Here's my theory on how to resolve this - simply buy three more watches, quickly, then sell three watches again, quickly. The feeling that your collection is coming down in size will make you comfortable once you get back to your starting point!
watching you fail in your quest for a “one watch” has been great entertainment
Watchaholic
‘Imprudently spendy’
Thomcat00
Watchaholic
‘Imprudently spendy’
Thomcat00
-
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 6:26 pm
- CW-watches: 1
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
My wife, despite loving jewellery, has NO INTEREST in watches. She thinks I do have only oneONE watch!!!
Are you mad, girl. Or have you been talking to my wife?
As has our idea of "formal wear" the DJ/Tux was originally considered to be for less formal occasions.Watches have evolved the same way
I started out with nothing and I still have most of it left
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
I think it was 1965. Well that seems to be when this advert was produced. Not sure if it was at a similar time, but the reverse of diving tool watch to evening wear was used in this DateJust advert. NeilWis wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:59 pm The concept of a one-watch is interesting. One watch that will not look out of place anywhere, and do basically everything. It is not the ‘my watch’ of most people way back when, which is of course what we would now call a dress watch.
So it is a ‘middle of the road’ kind of watch. A goldilock watch. Not too this and not too that. Of course, this is highly subjective. What looks out of place to me may seem perfectly ok to you. The Submariner is an interesting case to consider. It began life as a tool, designed to do a job.
Now the Submariner seems to qualify as a one-watch for most people - perhaps even the ultimate one-watch for men, because of years of very clever marketing. I would have liked to be present when someone bravely proposed that what was a very toolish watch ought to be marketed as a watch equally at home in the boardroom and at a cocktail reception as below the sea. Maybe the idea came from the Bond film? It is well documented that Connery was handed the personal Rolex of someone on the film set for the famous scene. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable in Rolex lore can tell us when the first ad along these lines came? And because of the Submariner other divers watches seem to qualify also, as long as they are somewhat discreet.
It seems to me that the current craze for steel sports watches is in part because they are seen as a one-watch to many people. A watch that is sporty, but ‘equally at home in the boardroom’.
Other watch forums of interest:
TZ-UK
TZ-UK
- Wis
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 3632
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:07 pm
- CW-watches: 1
- Location: Near Oslo, Norway
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
Thanks Neil. 1965 makes sense. The relevant Bond film, Dr. No, premiered 5. October 1962. So my theory could be true.
Bjørn
- Wis
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 3632
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:07 pm
- CW-watches: 1
- Location: Near Oslo, Norway
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
Reassuringly expensive, and universally recognised and respected. Not a bad combination when you need a watch to signal that you’ve made it. A very safe choice. No wonder it has become virtually unobtainable now that the Chinese middle class has discovered it.Amor Vincit Omnia wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:29 pmWhatever its beginnings, I do believe that the Submariner has been for a long time now a sensible, almost conservative, choice for a one watch. A dive watch that is discreet, perhaps some kind of PO or perhaps even a Trident mark 3, is quite obviously acceptable in any situation. The Rolex has a lot of plus points: great brand history and image; smart and stylish; excellent construction and reliability; and to quote an old advert for some type of booze (I can’t remember which) – reassuringly expensive.
Bjørn
- gwells
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 7642
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:02 am
- CW-watches: 1
- Location: falls church, va
Re: Is the Rolex Explorer II 'a' one-watch??
the rolex sub is also **THE** most "homaged" watch out there.
the "g" is for Greg...
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 45 Replies
- 2291 Views
-
Last post by cdmorenot
-
- 1 Replies
- 178 Views
-
Last post by Amor Vincit Omnia