FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
I no longer care, I have sent a message cancelling my FLE's although as yet no reply ( not unusual for CW) so I will see how long it takes them to get in touch. Good job I'm not expecting a deposit refund.......
- DEV.Woulf
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:53 pm
- CW-watches: 10
- Location: Rhode Island
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
That's unfortunate, Tyke. It took some days to digest the news, but now I'm digging the new (old) color. I think it's gonna be a cracker.
Christopher Ward | LORIER | MONTA | SEIKO
Joseph.
Joseph.
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Colour isn't the issue, I love the watch and the new colour looks great. The issue is that the latest sales debacles have caused me to question the validity of commiting further funds to a company that can't provide what you order in a timely and well prepared manner. I"ve spent a considerable sum with them over time but I no longer feel comfortable commiting further funds not knowing what if anything will turn up and in what condition. It will arrive.Devarika Woulf wrote:That's unfortunate, Tyke. It took some days to digest the news, but now I'm digging the new (old) color. I think it's gonna be a cracker.
It will cost me the lost deposits but I won't be putting the residue at risk.
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
A friend of mine introduced me to the brand and has pre-ordered one of these. Being new to this forum I'm clearly late to this party but have read this thread through. Just an observation but if you put a deposit down for something and then that product alters, doesn't that give those who put deposits down a right to allow backers an opportunity to change their mind and receive a refund of the deposit?
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Possibly, but minor tweaks are splitting hairs in reality, i'll kick the £200 into touch and move on.Summerz wrote:A friend of mine introduced me to the brand and has pre-ordered one of these. Being new to this forum I'm clearly late to this party but have read this thread through. Just an observation but if you put a deposit down for something and then that product alters, doesn't that give those who put deposits down a right to allow backers an opportunity to change their mind and receive a refund of the deposit?
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Wow. That's alot of cash to throw away. Wouldn't it be worth buying anyway and then flipping (for full retail or even profit?) or pursue the refund option. I think the latter under consumer law would apply (the changes may be small but are enough to warrant a thread and subsequent discussion/debate). Just saying.
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Better than chucking another £700+ at it with no confidence in the outcome. We agreed at the start of the process to a no-refund policy to ensure CW actually went ahead with the project, I see no foundation to renege on that nor have any reason to jeopardise anyone else's watches by altering the status quo.Summerz wrote:Wow. That's alot of cash to throw away. Wouldn't it be worth buying anyway and then flipping (for full retail or even profit?) or pursue the refund option. I think the latter under consumer law would apply (the changes may be small but are enough to warrant a thread and subsequent discussion/debate). Just saying.
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Is there a waiting list of reserves for anyone who missed out? That could sway a decision should you wish to consider a refund?
Wow, £900 in total for this watch (or have I miscalculated?)
Wow, £900 in total for this watch (or have I miscalculated?)
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Where are you getting that figure?Summerz wrote:Wow, £900 in total for this watch (or have I miscalculated?)
- Thermexman
- Trusted Seller
- Posts: 6225
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:40 am
- CW-watches: 4
- Location: South West UK
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Bravo Sir!Tyke wrote: Better than chucking another £700+ at it with no confidence in the outcome. We agreed at the start of the process to a no-refund policy to ensure CW actually went ahead with the project, I see no foundation to renege on that nor have any reason to jeopardise anyone else's watches by altering the status quo.
I congratulate your ethics. Sorry that you've been made to feel this way but fully understand. I must say, having had a couple of issues myself, (wrong strap on watch, sofa find delivered with broken crown and chipped crystal) this thread and other similar ones have, perversely, cheered me up! I was beginning to think it was me they were picking on! Now I know I'm not a "special target"!
Steve.
- Thermexman
- Trusted Seller
- Posts: 6225
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:40 am
- CW-watches: 4
- Location: South West UK
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Tyke ordered two. One was for Mrs Tyke.Summerz wrote:Is there a waiting list of reserves for anyone who missed out? That could sway a decision should you wish to consider a refund?
Wow, £900 in total for this watch (or have I miscalculated?)
Steve.
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
I ordered 2, one for me, one for my wife as she would've been almost certain to want mine when it arrived which wasn't happening.Summerz wrote:Is there a waiting list of reserves for anyone who missed out? That could sway a decision should you wish to consider a refund?
Wow, £900 in total for this watch (or have I miscalculated?)
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
Ah right, makes sense now. ThanksThermexman wrote:Tyke ordered two. One was for Mrs Tyke.Summerz wrote:Is there a waiting list of reserves for anyone who missed out? That could sway a decision should you wish to consider a refund?
Wow, £900 in total for this watch (or have I miscalculated?)
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
I have experience in consumer/customer services and if anyone from Christopher Ward is reading this I'd (at least as a goodwill gesture) offer Tyke a refund of his/her deposits. I am sure others will step in and buy the two anyway which means the brand won't lose out financially and probably won't lose a customer/fan (and I'd assume that is a priority too). The deposit it seems is non-refundable as part of the process/contract, however that was based on the original design which prompted the orders. As the design has since changed, however small, after deposits were paid, those who have ordered are within their rights to change their minds and request a refund. Contracts work both ways.Tyke wrote:I ordered 2, one for me, one for my wife as she would've been almost certain to want mine when it arrived which wasn't happening.Summerz wrote:Is there a waiting list of reserves for anyone who missed out? That could sway a decision should you wish to consider a refund?
Wow, £900 in total for this watch (or have I miscalculated?)
Re: FLE #7 update - Feedback needed
My FLE's are being cancelled primarily due to other issues and not due to the change of design which doesn't bother me.
Legalities don't really come into it, we negotiated the arrangement largely on trust and IMO that should remain otherwise it might kill any future FLE's.
My choice, my money, my decision to cancel, my loss. End of.
Legalities don't really come into it, we negotiated the arrangement largely on trust and IMO that should remain otherwise it might kill any future FLE's.
My choice, my money, my decision to cancel, my loss. End of.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 12 Replies
- 699 Views
-
Last post by Leon O
-
- 15 Replies
- 548 Views
-
Last post by tikkathree
-
- 18 Replies
- 393 Views
-
Last post by jkbarnes
-
- 37 Replies
- 1488 Views
-
Last post by gwells
-
- 7 Replies
- 810 Views
-
Last post by alexqaws