A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

The second forum Limited Edition of 100 pieces
Sold out
User avatar
28800bph
"Asylum Knight of the Diver"
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:48 am
CW-watches: 1
Location: USA

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by 28800bph »

How about a C7 with a valjoux 7750 that is modified to add a cuckoo clock function. A little mechanical bird would come out of a hole on the watch dial to announce the hours. This will be a fine complication!
User avatar
Lamps
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2341
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 pm
CW-watches: 2
LE-two: yes
Location: Bolton

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by Lamps »

I really dont think 28800bhp needs a cuckoo clock.
User avatar
28800bph
"Asylum Knight of the Diver"
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:48 am
CW-watches: 1
Location: USA

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by 28800bph »

Maybe not. But the cuckoo bird would look sweet coated in superluminova.
User avatar
FeelTheNoise
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:28 pm
CW-watches: 4

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by FeelTheNoise »

Re the question of why people would want an Auto C7, that's not necessarily what the results said. The movement question was seperate to the model, hence why there are 166 votes for an auto movement but only 72 votes for the C7!
It's technically possible that only 6 people voted auto & C7 and the other 66 voted C7 with handwinder,quartz or no pref...

just number-crunching, ignore me...

Phil

P.S.
Can someone remind me what the last question was? The results don't have a title, they just say:
Yes 199
No 11
No preference 22
ctafield

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by ctafield »

FeelTheNoise wrote: P.S.
Can someone remind me what the last question was? The results don't have a title, they just say:
Yes 199
No 11
No preference 22
I believe it was for a show case back.
okwhynot
Senior
Senior
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:34 am

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by okwhynot »

I think it might be an idea for Chris to make prototypes based on the top two votes ,pass the pictures and specifications back to the forum and then we all vote again ,adding any last minute suggestions we might have......
Then we all place our orders like our lives depend on it !! :lol:
User avatar
Yoda
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1988
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:55 pm
CW-watches: 7
Location: Suffolk, UK nr Holland

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by Yoda »

I haven't been following this thread, has something happened?
Indigo fugit


Yoda, bringing light to the dark side.
User avatar
village
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 5554
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:10 pm
CW-watches: 4
Location: any further South and my feet would be wet...

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by village »

Yoda wrote:I haven't been following this thread, has something happened?
Not telling....... :buch:
If you can read this you are too close to your computer screen....
User avatar
Rick
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1667
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:01 am
CW-watches: 8
LE-one: yes
Location: Gateway to the South

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by Rick »

village wrote:
Yoda wrote:I haven't been following this thread, has something happened?
Not telling....... :buch:
I,m with him :-$
C5AKS - C7 Rapide - C4IPK - C6T3 - C6 Forum LE - W6 Splash - C8SWT - C70 DBR1
Breitling Hercules - Omega SMP - Boschett Cave Dweller - Seiko Monster - Porsche Design P'6310
Tissot Sea Touch - Oris Pro Diver - Dreyfuss 1925 - Tissot V8 - Deep Blue Pro Sun
User avatar
paw3001
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 2798
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:50 pm
CW-watches: 4
LE-two: yes
Location: Berlin - Brexit Refugee!

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by paw3001 »

Shhh... :-#
Watches - Too many but not enough!
delays
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:30 pm

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by delays »

Just a quick question - when it becomes available, does every single member qualify to purchase if they get in quick enough, regardless of the length of their membership on the forum?

I only ask because I've been here for all of two days.
User avatar
Lamps
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2341
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 pm
CW-watches: 2
LE-two: yes
Location: Bolton

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by Lamps »

I think anyone will be able to my one, but unless your a forum member you wouldn't be aware that the watch was for sale, I think it is done on a first come first served basis, or as I like to say, if your not fast, your last, so there is likely to be a few disappointed memebers.
User avatar
village
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 5554
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:10 pm
CW-watches: 4
Location: any further South and my feet would be wet...

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by village »

Although...just to be Devils Advocate :devil: or something....should length of time served/posts and therefore activity on the Forum etc be a consideration when it comes to allocating the LE? Should a newbie who joins the day the LE is released and has posted once be as equally entitled as a longer serving member,say with with 1000+ posts?
Just thought this might provoke an interesting discussion..... :klugscheisser:
If you can read this you are too close to your computer screen....
ctafield

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by ctafield »

village wrote:Although...just to be Devils Advocate :devil: or something....should length of time served/posts and therefore activity on the Forum etc be a consideration when it comes to allocating the LE? Should a newbie who joins the day the LE is released and has posted once be as equally entitled as a longer serving member,say with with 1000+ posts?
Just thought this might provoke an interesting discussion..... :klugscheisser:
I agree, however, "Christopher Ward" has zero posts! He shouldn't be allowed to have one! :D

S'all a bit pot luck isn't it. I agree though, it should be based on posts/time served etc... (and yes, I know I got my name down on the Stowa forum watch a day or so after joining that forum...)
User avatar
28800bph
"Asylum Knight of the Diver"
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:48 am
CW-watches: 1
Location: USA

Re: A poll - what should be the basis of our LE?

Post by 28800bph »

village wrote:Although...just to be Devils Advocate :devil: or something....should length of time served/posts and therefore activity on the Forum etc be a consideration when it comes to allocating the LE? Should a newbie who joins the day the LE is released and has posted once be as equally entitled as a longer serving member,say with with 1000+ posts?
Just thought this might provoke an interesting discussion..... :klugscheisser:

Good idea, but announcing that rule would probably create some unintended behavior: First a lot of useless posts! New members could go in the gallery and add a trivial post to each thread: "Nice watch! Great photos!" Build up their count real fast. And it might create a market for selling CWL forum accounts on ebay (like gamers sell experienced character accounts). And some people might open several CWL forum accounts from different e-mails to build up posts and service time. Hmmm. It could be fun to create two imaginary characters and have them bicker about watch movements and strap styles. :lol:
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post